Login | Member Center | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Submit | Subscription services | E-Edition | Mobile Version | Advertising Info

HomeNewsBoulder & County News

Boulder budget looking up

City Council looking to infuse money into fire dept., other programs

Modest gains in the city of Boulder’s budget will mean money to buy new firefighting equipment, hire a firefighter, fight underage drinking and plant more trees next year, among other improvements.

But the version of the budget going forward now doesn’t include money for some other items on elected leaders’ wish lists — including planting more flowers in city parks, extending library hours that were cut back three years ago and hiring two extra police officers.

The Boulder City Council sat down for a study session Tuesday night to look at next year’s budget. The budget is still in its draft stage, and it won’t be finalized until it’s been through two more City Council readings in October and November.

The revenue picture for 2009 looks fairly optimistic, Bob Eichem, a deputy city manager, told the City Council.

“At this point, it looks like we’re in good shape,” he said.

Eichem said he’s confident the city will meet budget forecasts to increase sales and use tax revenue 3.8 percent this year and another 3.9 percent next year.

That means there should be enough money to pay for:

An extra $414,000 for additional staff in the city’s Planning and Development Services Department to help move applications through the approval process more quickly, in addition to other services.

Another $50,000 for “high-priority” items for the library system, including more staff to shelve books, more maintenance and more library furnishings and materials. But officials said they haven’t been able to find the money to extend library hours that were trimmed three years ago.

$673,000 for the city’s economic vitality program, which is still being paid for with one-time funding. City leaders talked Tuesday night about eventually dedicating ongoing revenue to pay for the program, which aims to lure businesses to Boulder and keep them in the city.

A $21,000 boost in ongoing funding to the police department’s budget to pay for preventing underage drinking and other alcohol-related problems.

$50,000 to study building an early childhood education center at the former Mapleton Elementary School, $85,000 to hire another firefighter, $100,000 to replace firefighting equipment, $32,000 in ongoing money for tree-planting, $35,000 for youth-risk programs, $50,000 in ongoing money for Boulder Housing Partners and $20,000 in one-time money on “diversity and inclusion” efforts.

Elected leaders said they’re ready to stop paying any operational expenses for Boulder Community Media, which runs public-access television. After cutting funding for Boulder’s Channel 54, the City Council last year approved spending $70,000 in one-time funds on an educational channel.

Mayor Shaun McGrath said elected leaders might be willing to provide a small amount of money — once — if officials from Boulder Community Media come forward with a plan to support their activities in the future from non-city sources.

City leaders also said they’re worried about budget numbers from the utilities department that call for 8 percent hikes in water rates for the next three years to pay for improved infrastructure.

“I don’t think a 24 percent increase over three years is going to be acceptable to people,” City Councilwoman Susan Osborne said.

City leaders said they’ll want to see more precise calculations — and options for making improvements without sharply increasing rates — before they approve new rates.

Comments

Posted by jadam12 on August 27, 2008 at 12:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Thank goodness, now we don't have to vote "yes" on the Boulder budget ballot initiatives in November.

I was soooooo concerned about the financial state of Boulder's budget (one of the wealthiest cities in the world, by the way).

Posted by ktr-dailycamera on August 27, 2008 at 6:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Actually, if water rates are increased 8% per year for three years, the net increase will be 26%, not 24%, due to compound interest.

I'd also certainly like to see what the proposed water "improvements" are. I remember a few years ago our rates were increased significantly so we could build a wastewater treatment plant. The plant is now built, but have our rates been decreased? Where is *that* money now going?

All I know for sure is that today I am paying more for each gallon of water than my relatives who live in the Southern California desert. And their water is hauled all the way from *our* mountains.

Posted by meatpieandtatters on August 27, 2008 at 6:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Crud. More bureaucratic bloat courtesy of a receipts-hungry city council.

Sure, rather than refund money to the citizens, the government wonks spend. It's a vicious cycle repeated at all levels of government.

Don't you love the "fighting underage drinking stuff?" It's like back in the 50s when "rock-n-roll" was characterized as the path to fornication. Not that it wasn't, but the idea that the system is continuing to flex its muscles and expand its influence to regulate society is a slippery slope.

Meanwhile, I see another building on Pearl St. was razed the other day. No doubt, another developer sees the opportunity for more million dollar residences. Pretty soon Boulder will have a monolithic appearance, not unlike Canyon between 15th and 9th, with retail banks occupying street level and high priced office space above. All the character will be gone. All the private business owners will be forced out and we'll be left with more crummy chains offering more "Paris Hilton-esque" sun glasses and slutilicious clothing.

The white-bread homogenization is underway. Scraping properties and filling lots with ostentatious manifestations of their ego size. Median family homes will be a thing of the past as long as the Boulder council continues to spend and expand. They have to keep tapping the citizenry to fund their folly.

Progress? No. A disturbance to the force and one's contemplative solitude.

Or maybe I have indigestion?

Posted by aprilsmile on August 27, 2008 at 6:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

meatpie: what building was razed?

also, vote no on the tax increases that the city council supposedly HAD to have to function. what a bunch of lies.

Posted by SoBoPop on August 27, 2008 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Vote no on all city tax increases.

Posted by backrange on August 27, 2008 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Amazing what eliminating free coffees at Vic's has done for the city budget.

And, I foolishly thought the economy was bad. Hmmm, guess you can't believe what you read/hear. Go figure.

Posted by IQ on August 27, 2008 at 8:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/bus...

For how long? Deals with companies for over 100million dollars who are considered for civil and criminal indictment? Companies the citizen of Boulder will pay to avoid indictment. 5th largest polluter, according to NYT article, 8/28. Would we deal with Cemex, Dow and Rockwell?

DC articles 5/15, 8/13

Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.

Camera staff does not actively monitor comments. If you believe a comment breaks the user agreement, please flag the comment and someone will take a look at it.

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn: